Last week I traveled to Rhode Island with two friends for a fun co-blogging adventure. Our destination was the Attwater Inn in beautiful Newport RI. I had heard so much about the new boutique hotels from Lark and I was excited check it out. The Attwater was designed by Boston’s own Rachel Reider and it is colorful, fresh and unexpected.
Myself and Susan Kanoff (AKA The midlife fashionista) along with architectural photographer extraordinaire, Emily O’brien, were let loose for a whole day to shoot fashion and interiors. Susan and I will be co-posting a fun fashion/interior blog soon but today it is all about Emily’s professional DSLR camera vs. my iphone camera.
If you follow me on Instagram you know that I only use my iphone camera these days to photograph due to restrictions caused by arthritis in my neck. I can no longer carry around or use my heavy DSLR cameras. I was therefore really curious to see how much of a difference there would be between Emily’s full frame professional architectural camera and my simple iphone camera. Our plan was to match up photo for photo and keep everything the same except for the cameras.
Here are the details of our camera smack down.
In Emily’s corner:A Canon 5D MarkII with two set of lenses; a 24-70mm and 85mm plus a tripod. Price on the Canon Mark 5D II: $2,300-$2,500 for the body only.
In my corner:An iPhone6 Plus (no additional lens or attachments). Price on the iphone6 Plus: $199.00 at Walmart 2 years ago.
First up for our camera smack down was one of the bedrooms at The Attwater. The lighting was good and there was plenty of space to move around and choose our favorite angle. Here is Emily’s image using her Canon 5D and tripod.
Now compare to my hand held iphone camera
Pretty darn close don’t you think? If you look closely you will see the color of the wood wall in Emily’s photo is slightly warmer than in mine but that color difference is to be expected between any two cameras. We could have color corrected them to look identical but for this smack down our images are not enhanced or color corrected. We are really just comparing the overall quality of the images right out of the camera.
Here is another bedroom and again, the lighting was good. First up is Emily’s image
and below is my image:
Then a detail of one of the bedrooms. Emily’s Canon photo is up first
And below is my iPhone photo is below:
Almost indistinguishable…right? At this point I will admit I was feeling a little smug. My iPhone camera was holding it’s own in this DSLR vs. iPhone smack down.Then things went a little down hill and that hill was called bad lighting. The iPhone is great when the lighting is good but when the lighting is poor then it is hard to compete with a high quality camera on a tripod.
First is Emily’s image taken in a very dark corner of the bedroom. Since she was using a tripod and a manual setting she could do a long exposure so that the colors are still bright and there is good contrast.
Below is my image. Unfortunately it is flat and grainy and the colors are not saturated like they are in Emily’s. At the very least I needed a tripod. I could boost the contrast using one of the camera apps but it is still going to “read” grainy and again I wanted to compare the overall quality.
Next up was the most difficult challenge yet. A dimly lit room with bright light streaming through large windows. This is the WORST lighting scenario for an interior photographer so I had to work really hard on this one. Emily did not bring in any additional interior lighting to keep the match fair. I was not surprised that Emily’s Canon nailed it on this room smack down as well. The colors are strong and the image is crisp. Again, she used a tripod with a long exposure and allowed the windows to blow out.
Comparing Emily’s image to my image below I will concede mine is not terrible but it has some quality issues. The iphone image is very grainy (look at the wall to the left of the sofa) and the sofa is blurry because I didn’t have a tripod (and in this case I definitely needed one). I did use the iphone exposure lock feature to manually adjust the exposure to get it as close to Emily’s photo as possible. For posting on instagram or Facebook my image is actually fine. Any larger though, forget it.
Another big difference between the two cameras is that the iphone 6 plus has a fixed focal length of 29mm. This is wider than most interior photographers would choose to use unless they are shooting a very tight space such as a small powder room. I would have to stand way forward from where Emily positioned her tripod to get the approximate same angle. Another problem with such a wide focal length is that it can cause distortion so that is another area where the iphone can’t compete with a camera with interchangeable lenses.
One last detail shot where the iPhone did a great job. The iPhone really excels in close up or detail shots. The first image is Emily’s
and below the same image shot with the iPhone
The Final Results: Emily for the Win!
I was under no allusion that the iPhone camera would come out the winner…I mean come on, it’s an iphone camera…but the results were actually surprising. Some of our images are very close but you can also clearly see where the iphone falls flat. If your end goal is to post on Instgram or your blog then I think the iphone is totally sufficient. If you learn how to use all the features the phone offers it can rival an expensive DSLR as long as the lighting is good. However, if you are a designer photographing for your portfolio there is no better money spent than on a professional interior photographer. So there you have it!
I have shared several tips in past blogs for getting better iphone photos and if you missed them you can check them out below:
- Taking better iPhone photos
- Best way to photograph furniture with an iPhone
- Taking better photos of kids and pets with the iphone
How do you think the iphone camera did? Does it change your thinking about your own cell phone camera?